Independent publisher · not clinic-owned Editorial policy Educational information only, not medical advice
Risks & Safety

SMILE Pro and Dry Eyes: What the Evidence Shows

Some published comparisons suggest SMILE is associated with less early dry-eye impact and better preservation of corneal sensation than flap-based LASIK. The finding is plausible and mechanistically sensible, but it is not a guarantee, and pre-existing dry eye is assessed before any procedure.

By
SmilePro.ae editorial team
Review status
Medical review pending: what this means
Published
Last updated

At a glance

  • Corneal nerves are interrupted differently by a flap than by a small incision, which is the mechanism behind the claim.
  • Comparative studies generally favour SMILE early on, with differences narrowing over time in many reports.
  • Pre-existing dry eye can make measurements unreliable, so the surface is treated before surgery.
  • Dry eye is a reason to reassess, not automatically a reason to be declined.

Dry eye is the most discussed side effect in refractive surgery, and also the one most often reduced to a slogan. “SMILE is better for dry eyes” is a claim you will see in clinic marketing, and like most slogans it is partly true, importantly incomplete, and unhelpful if you are the person with dry eyes considering surgery.

Here is what is actually established, and where the uncertainty sits.

Why would a flapless procedure affect dry eye differently?

The cornea is densely innervated. Fine nerve fibres run through the surface layers, and they do two things: they provide sensation, and they drive the reflex that tells the eye to produce tears. Interrupt the nerves and both functions can be affected temporarily: reduced sensation, less tear production, and a surface that dries more quickly.

A LASIK flap is created by cutting through the surface layer of the cornea, which severs a proportion of those nerves across a broad area. A SMILE incision is a small arc at the edge of the cornea, so far fewer fibres are cut and the surface layer remains substantially continuous.

That mechanism is straightforward, and it is the reason the difference was predicted rather than merely observed.

What do the studies show?

Comparative studies and meta-analyses have generally reported differences favouring SMILE on measures such as corneal sensation, tear film stability and dry-eye symptom scores in the early post-operative period. Several have found that the difference narrows over the following months.

There are also studies that find smaller differences, or none, and the way a study defines and measures dry eye materially affects its conclusions. Symptom questionnaires, staining, tear break-up time and sensation testing are four different measurements of four related but distinct things.

The honest summary is: a difference is plausible, mechanistically supported, and reported by several studies, but it is a relative advantage in a risk that exists for both procedures. It is not a licence to ignore dry eye.

Why is dry eye assessed before surgery?

Two reasons, and the second is underappreciated.

Comfort afterwards. Someone entering surgery with a compromised tear film is more likely to notice symptoms during recovery, and possibly beyond it.

Measurement accuracy. A dry or unstable tear film distorts the cornea and makes topography and refraction less repeatable. If your measurements vary between visits, your correction may be planned on unreliable numbers, which is a problem for accuracy, not just comfort.

Because of the second point, an unstable surface can affect the quality of the surgery itself, not only the experience of recovering from it.

What happens if you have dry eyes?

Usually, a sequence rather than a no:

  1. Assess and measure. Tear break-up time, staining, meibomian gland assessment and symptoms.
  2. Treat the surface. Lubricants, lid hygiene, prescription drops, punctal plugs, treatment of blepharitis or meibomian gland dysfunction: the specific treatment follows the specific cause.
  3. Reassess. Often after several weeks. If the measurements have become stable and repeatable, surgery can be reconsidered.
  4. Adjust the plan. Sometimes the procedure choice changes; sometimes the plan moves to a different approach entirely.

Being asked to treat a dry eye for a month and come back is a sign of a careful assessment. It is also the point at which some people discover their dry eye was a longstanding, under-treated condition, which is worth knowing whether or not they proceed.

What does dry eye feel like after surgery?

Commonly: a gritty or sandy sensation, watering (which sounds contradictory but is common), a feeling that vision wavers and clears when you blink, and discomfort that worsens over a screen-heavy day.

It is usually most noticeable in the first weeks and improves as the surface recovers. For some people it lasts longer, and for a small number it persists.

There is also a measurement problem in the other direction: reduced corneal sensation can mean the eye feels normal while being dry, which is why follow-up appointments look at the surface rather than relying on symptoms alone.

What this means for you

If you already know you have dry eyes, do not accept a clinic’s reassurance that SMILE Pro will not be a problem for you. Ask what the assessment found, what the treatment plan is before surgery, and what the clinic’s experience has been with patients who had a similar baseline.

If you have no particular dry-eye symptoms, that is a good starting position, but it is still worth asking how your tear film was assessed, because the answer affects the accuracy of everything measured afterwards.

Our risks page covers the broader side-effect picture, and the comparison page shows how dry-eye considerations differ between SMILE Pro, LASIK and PRK.

Questions this article answers

Can SMILE Pro cause dry eyes?

It can. Any refractive procedure involves cutting corneal nerves, which affects the feedback loop that keeps the ocular surface comfortable and moist. Published evidence suggests early dry-eye signs and symptoms are generally less pronounced after SMILE than after flap-based LASIK, but the literature is not unanimous and many patients still experience dryness.

Most people who develop dryness after surgery find it improves over the first months. For a minority it is persistent. If you already have dry eye, that is a conversation your assessment should address directly rather than gloss over.

Sources Journal of Ophthalmology (via PubMed Central) , Peer-reviewed literature (via PubMed Central) , Peer-reviewed literature (via PubMed Central)

Can I have SMILE Pro if I have dry eyes?

It depends on how severe your dry eye is, what is causing it and how it responds to treatment. Mild, well-controlled dry eye may not be a barrier. Significant or untreated ocular surface disease is often a reason to treat the surface first, to delay, or to advise against refractive surgery altogether.

This is one of the reasons a thorough preoperative assessment matters. Tear film, meibomian gland function and ocular surface staining are measurements, not opinions, and they should be taken before anyone quotes you a price.

Sources Peer-reviewed literature (via PubMed Central) , Peer-reviewed literature (via PubMed Central)

What are the side effects of SMILE Pro?

The most commonly reported side effects are dry eye or a gritty sensation, glare, halos, starbursts around lights, light sensitivity, and vision that fluctuates during the early healing period. Many of these improve over the first weeks and months, but some people report symptoms persisting longer.

Sources StatPearls, NCBI Bookshelf , Peer-reviewed literature (via PubMed Central)

See all frequently asked questions Browse the vision knowledge base

Sources & further reading

We prefer primary sources. Where a claim comes from a manufacturer, a single study or a regulator, it is labelled as such below.

  • Dry Eye after Small Incision Lenticule Extraction (SMILE) versus Femtosecond Laser-Assisted In Situ Keratomileusis: A Meta-Analysis Peer-reviewed literature Journal of Ophthalmology (via PubMed Central) · 2016

    A meta-analysis pooling several studies on dry eye after SMILE compared with femtosecond LASIK. It also documents where the included studies disagreed.

    Used for The dry-eye discussion on the comparison and risks pages; Explaining that the evidence base is mixed rather than unanimous.

    Link checked 22 September 2026

  • Dry eye and corneal sensitivity after small incision lenticule extraction: a meta-analysis Peer-reviewed literature Peer-reviewed literature (via PubMed Central)

    A meta-analysis of corneal sensitivity and dry-eye measures after SMILE compared with femtosecond LASIK, generally finding faster recovery of sensation in the SMILE group in the early postoperative period.

    Used for Corneal sensation and dry-eye timing discussions.

    Link checked 22 September 2026

  • Dry Eyes After SMILE Peer-reviewed literature Peer-reviewed literature (via PubMed Central)

    A review of ocular surface changes after SMILE, including how dry-eye signs and symptoms are measured and how they change over the first postoperative months.

    Used for Explaining why dry eye is a key preoperative consideration.

    Link checked 22 September 2026

  • Refractive surgery and dry eye: an update Peer-reviewed literature Peer-reviewed literature (via PubMed Central) · 2023

    An update on how different refractive procedures affect the ocular surface, with attention to preoperative screening for dry eye.

    Used for Why tear film assessment belongs in preoperative screening.

    Link checked 22 September 2026

  • Post-LASIK dry eye disease: A comprehensive review of the current literature Peer-reviewed literature Peer-reviewed literature (via PubMed Central)

    A review of dry eye after LASIK, including the mechanisms involved and how other procedures compare in the published literature.

    Used for Balanced comparison of dry-eye risk between procedures.

    Link checked 22 September 2026